How do you weigh in on the Vance-couch conversation?

Masturbation isn’t bad. It provides most of the benefits of sex, many of which actively improve human health, with zero risk of disease or pregnancy. It is an objectively good thing that most of us ought to do more often. Not for pleasure, though pleasure is also good, but for our health.

But what if he had? Why are we shaming him for this? Why would we shame anyone for this?

Vance didn’t, or that’s the story. And honestly, I believe it. He’s a bit too uptight for that sort of thing.

Is there a type of function where every point has exactly one tangent line passing through it? If yes, what is this type of function called?

It’s a creative form of masturbation that may feel pretty darn good.

I don’t see what’s wrong with banging couches.

Decadent Girl by Ramon Casas. Public domain.

Have you ever met someone and something seemed so unusual about them but you couldn't put your finger on what it was?

We need to stop shaming people for healthy activities they do in the privacy of their own homes.

Creativity is also good, especially as the story would cause no harm to the couch and didn’t involve any direct contact with it. There’s no ick factor here, just a young person having fun in a way that doesn’t harm or impose upon anyone else.

This, if he’d done it, would be perfectly okay.

What was it like being spanked as a kid?

How do you weigh in on the Vance-couch conversation?

Read also: